Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2SSR
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2SSR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
G11 declined. No sources, and my BEFORE check did not find any SIGCOV. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Australia. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Only 5 gnews hits. The first 2 may be considered indepth but they are an industry related source and a local newspaper. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 01:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.