Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIM-HIGH trial

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 20:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AIM-HIGH trial

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single study (WP:MEDPRI, without notability for its own article, study never completed due to failure of the project, almost no pages use this page -- "Pages that link here" in Namespace: Article or Talk only shows a couple pages; there hadn't been maybe 90% of the other links until it was disseminated through automatic AfD lists. Altanner1991 (talk) 23:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Individual primary studies are not usually given their own articles. For example, a random science article like Cholesterol has almost 100 in-line citation references to studies (most of the 94 references on that page), but none of those studies are ever given their own articles. Altanner1991 (talk) 22:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2018-08 ✍️ create

Delete as it was a single study without being notable for starting or ending. Hun ter 01:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Could we close and delete on this one? Thank you. Altanner1991 (talk) 12:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.