Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhi the Nomad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎ . ✗plicit 11:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abhi the Nomad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously added a notability tag which has since been removed but with no more sources added. From my searching, I couldn't find anything that looked valuable, and the lack of significant additional material since that tag despite at least one editor actively working on the page suggests it might not exist. Doesn't appear to pass GNG or any part of WP:MUSICBIO. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Tamil Nadu, and Texas. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP fails GNG and BIO. Article is sourced with promo. BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per V, BLP and BIO. // Timothy :: talk 11:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as The Chicago Sun Times, AllMusic, Austin Chronicle, Austin Chronicle and NPR so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:16, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The interviews in the Austin Chronicle (above) provide some independent analysis and are not just letting the artist talk. See Wikipedia:Interviews BruceThomson (talk) 08:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sources shown by Atlantic306 above, which show that WP:MUSICBIO is met. — sparklism ^hey! 09:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.