Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achini Chamen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Alex Shih ^Talk 06:28, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Achini Chamen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:27, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:27, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:27, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NGYMNAST #1 by virtue of having competed in the World Championships. Smartyllama (talk) 16:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a single source is not enough to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clearly passes WP:NGYMNAST as mentioned by Smartyllama as she competed in the world championships. This appears to be an open and shut case. Ross-c (talk) 18:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable enough for the scope the subject has been covered. Bisharch (talk) 02:33, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: User Bisharch's 4th edit was to this Afd; I'm not sure they understand the import of our guidelines while mentioning keep. Re-listing this Afd one conclusive time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 15:07, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.