Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Clendening

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Cirt (talk) 14:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Clendening

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article has not attained notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 18:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Adequate sourcing to demonstrate WP:GNG. Also was an all-star at the IIHF U18, which may itself be interpreted as meeting WP:NHOCKEY criterion 4. Rlendog (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Passes GNG, and also meets criteria #4 of WP:NHOCKEY by being selected as a First Team All-Star at the 2010 IIHF World U18 Championships. Dolovis (talk) 01:07, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As has been noted above, there's a good case here that he does meet NHOCKEY. Qrsdogg (talk) 19:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.