Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolph Visser
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 17:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Adolph Visser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG (talk) 18:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and South Africa. JTtheOG (talk) 18:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON, although passes the old WP:NRU guidelines. Lots of coverage but not anything that looks to be WP:GNG currently. No suitable redirect per WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: An article of a sports person that needs more to meet SIGCOV, GNG and SPORTSBASIC. While I am not using the WP:THREE essay here is that I can't verify his notability at all on the sports career. This is eventually a case of TOOSOON. Draftifying could have been an option but no!, far from meeting notability! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.