Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Doughty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 18:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Doughty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced biography stub of dubious notability. -- Cain Mosni (talk||contribs) 15:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:BIO, WP:RS, WP:V, etc. Qworty (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Honorary membership of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, described here and sourced in the article (despite the obviously untrue claim in the nomination that it is unsourced), would appear to meet the requirements of WP:PROF criterion 3. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I believe he passes WP:SCHOLAR due to his invention of a device which is cited in several anaesthesia textbooks.[1] He also appears to have been a notable teacher of other anaesthetists. I have expanded the article and added references. --MelanieN (talk) 14:01, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:56, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A major figure in his field. Warden (talk) 22:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.