Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angell Summers
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Angell Summers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG. Absolutely vapid non-biography. Winning a "SHAFTA Award" not an autopass even under the reprehensible PORNBIO SNG. Carrite (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 07:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 07:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 07:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 07:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - does not appear to meet WP:PORNBIO criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete does not even come close to passing our guidelines for the biographies of pornographic actresses. This is one of the categories that is most plagued with the creation of articles on people lacking any reliable source coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete- Doesn't even meet the ridiculous standards of PORNBIO, let alone anything resembling proper encyclopedic coverage. Reyk YO! 22:13, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per sources on Google News - Meets PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010Talk 17:56, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The SHAFTA "award" is a fan award and easily gamed. Despite the claim immediately above which is offered without evidence, this person is not notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.