Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anil V. Kumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anil V. Kumar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:FILMMAKER, WP:DIRECTOR also Wikipedia general notability criteria. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 12:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Actors and filmmakers. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 12:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Fairly meets WP:DIRECTOR/WP:FILMMAKER as director of multiple notable series.......Added a few sources for verification.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:57, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Meets WP:DIRECTOR. Has several notable directions.

Rydex64 (talk) 19:57, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Passes GNG per WP: SIGCOV. A bit WP: DIRECTOR since some of the films which are inarguably notable were co-directed. As the case may be, the subject passes WP: CREATIVE in filmmaking having been cited in sources for his Entertaining styles and film directing. Fills a bit of WP: ENT All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 23:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looks like XFDcloser failed the "transclude to new log" again on this one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the relisting when a simple consensus is met. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 09:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Otuọcha, XFDcloser screwed up the relisting. When a discussion is relisted, it's taken off the old AFD daily log page and put on today's AFD daily log page. It looks like neither one of those things happened so it was wise to relist this discussion as no editors or closers would have gone back to the AFD daily log page from March 12th to review this discussion. It brought the discussion up from several weeks ago to this past week so fresh eyes could see it. Unfortunately though, we didn't get any new participants here but it will probably close over the next 24 hours. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.