Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann M. Dibb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ann M. Dibb

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject fails the basic criteria of notability, WP:BASIC. Firstly, a person is presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. These sources provided are not intellectually independent of each other, they are internal publications of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, reporting on their own internal appointments. Secondly, in any case, the depth of coverage of these sources is not substantial, and qualifies as trivial coverage of the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sansumaria (talk • contribs) 08:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:34, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:34, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:34, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - The vast majority of google news results for Dibb are about her father, Thomas S. Monson. There are exceptions, such as this, which are profiles related to her position as second councelor of Young Women (organization). Her profile or coverage may grow, but right now I don't see enough material for a clear, NPOV biography. I think improvement is posible and would approve of re-creation if better sources are found. I'm not sure how high of a profile she is that a redirect to Monson or Young Women would be helpful. Smmurphy^(Talk) 22:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see decent sourcing coming out of the Mormon church, but that is of no use in terms of notability as she worked for the church and it is therefore not independent. I can barely see a claim of importance here-- she's important... why? When you put those two together I do not see notability being established by sources, and I do not see the reason for her inclusion in the encyclopedia either.104.163.148.25 (talk) 06:33, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.