Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuradha Sharma Pujari
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (NAC) RMHED (talk) 23:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Anuradha Sharma Pujari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only significant media references to this writer are in blogs. Please note also possible conflict of interest of article creator; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katha Books for more information. Chick Bowen 01:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 01:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 04:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I found citations noting her work as editor of a popular publication in Assam and noting her as a significant and popular author in that region. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article Anuradha Sarma Pujari which has its own source needs to be merged with this article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC) Done[reply]
- Keep per improvements made by User:ChildofMidnight, which establish notability of the subject. Note that further sources are likely to be available in Assamese, although even the current version based on English language and online sources is in decent shape. Abecedare (talk) 04:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per ChildofMidnight's improvements that show notability. -SpacemanSpiff 01:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.