Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArcDLA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:58, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- ArcDLA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim of notability, no secondary sources, google hits all lead to further advertisement pages. The article reads like an advertisement, created with single-purpose account. As a recently established office (2009) and no major projects, unlikely to be notable. ELEKHHT 02:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ELEKHHT 00:48, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no sources, meets criteria for WP:ADVERT. MaNeMeBasat (talk) 07:36, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non notable. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.