Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Spurlin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 02:43, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Spurlin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biographical article fails WP:GNG - neither a Bronze Star nor being in a single reality show season makes a person encyclopedic. At best this is a BLP1E candidate and perhaps a small amount of this information should be merged into Top Shot.

Of relevance is that the subject has requested deletion for privacy reasons. [1] NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and merge non-private material with Top Shot (season 2). Gamaliel (talk) 04:03, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is no actual evidence that the subject requested deletion. (The revision history] for this article is littered with death threats from anonymous IP contributors demanding this page be deleted, and the diff claiming to be the subject has no evidence it's the subject.) __ E L A Q U E A T E 07:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:36, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable indpendent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 19:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This sergeant fails WP:SOLDIER, an essay I consider useful, and a brief TV appearance in a shooting competition is insufficient for notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non notable subject. Redirect the name to the parent article for the TV show (or individual season's article). -- John Reaves 23:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and point of order I agree with NBSB, however we don't know if the person claiming to be the subject is actually the subject.Two kinds of pork (talk) 01:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the deletion request sounds dubious, but with borderline notability at best, we should err on the side of caution. St Anselm (talk) 03:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable reality show contestant. The fact that somebody claiming to be the subject requested deletion is of zero relevance, as always. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:22, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SOLDIER and WP:BLP1E; not enough relevant material for merge to Top Shot. Miniapolis 21:33, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If that ends up being the consensus, when will the deletion take place? I'd like to know so I can move some of the content to the Season 2 article on Top Shot. Thief12 (talk) 13:16, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ordinarily, AfD discussions stay open at least seven days; however, since this is a snow-close candidate you may want to merge the content sooner rather than later. All the best, Miniapolis 16:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.