Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asoke Cat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Asoke Cat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Trivial meme. DGG ( talk ) 22:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The references include multiple independent sources. It satisfies WP:GNG and this is probably not the place to argue in general about meme guidelines. --Sammy1339 (talk) 17:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 19:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No length of coverage - it was a meme for a month and disappeared, independent sources be damned there was no lengthy coverage or impact to establish notability. --TKK! bark with me! 15:24, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- May to November 2013 (date of references in the aticle) seems to span more than "a month". --101.108.104.139 (talk) 05:11, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 18:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. May not meet Wikipedia:Notability. --Love Krittaya (talk) 19:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't even commit to "does not," that's not a very compelling case for deleting. What about the several news sources already listed in the article's references? --Sammy1339 (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This was a news item enjoying brief coverage. Yes, it's a cute cat, and is fine for Facebook -- but it doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 05:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.