Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aston Martin Vanquish S
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Aston Martin Vanquish. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Aston Martin Vanquish S (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The Aston Martin Vanquish S is simply a tuned version of an existing car, the Aston Martin Vanquish. It is therefore analogous to the LP670-4 version of the Lamborghini Murcielago, the GTO version of the Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano, or the Super Sport version of the Bugatti Veyron. None of these special trims have -- or need -- their own page; they are covered as sub-models within the parent article. This should be true of the Vanquish S. I would have proposed this as a merge, but the Vanquish article already contains almost the entire text of the Vanquish S article, so a merge is superfluous. Sacxpert (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think the user has done a good job on the page. He has put lots of infomation therefore I think it should be Keeped. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 07:58, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I don't deny that there is useful information, but that information has been (largely) included in the Aston Martin Vanquish, which is where I'd say it belongs, as a section heading. We don't have separate pages for the 599 GTO, the Murcielago SV, the Veyron SS, or the various iterations of the Spyker C8. The Vanquish S simply isn't distinct enough, on its own merits, to warrant its own page. Sacxpert (talk) 10:20, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per nomination--Antwerpen Synagoge (talk) 19:27, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked Sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה. -- DQ (t) (e) 19:41, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per. Nice page, just not distinct from Aston Martin Vanquish Douglasi (talk) 16:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 01:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As per nom. Even though the article is well written and good effort have been used on it, it does not have notability, because it is a limited and tunned version of a existent car. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 01:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sidenote - To prevent loss of information, the article text could be incorporated as a section into Aston Martin Vanquish article. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 01:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.