Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bakal
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was del. mikka (t) 01:51, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- NOTE: I recreated the page with an article for a town in Russia, with DAB page that preserves the deleted info about a fictional character. mikka (t) 03:09, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrectly tagged as speedy with this note: not noteworthy enough for own article, already addressed at List_of_species_in_fantasy_fiction Listing here. No vote. · Katefan0(scribble) 19:04, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above WAvegetarian 19:43, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn fictional character. "Dragonlance Bakal" gets only 66 hits[1]. "Dragon Lance Bakal" gets only 776 more. Some are probably duplicates. Johntex\talk 22:52, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep, real fictional character, would belong in an encyclopedia of whatever work it's from. Kappa 05:03, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Abstain since the list and the article disagree. Kappa 14:38, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. We all agree that it's real. It just isn't separately notable from Dragon Lance. Please see the comment above and page link. As, in it's current state, it only duplicates info found at the above link, it should be deleted, unless you think that it will at some ppoint be changed into a full article. In that case, would you write a stub for it?WAvegetarian 08:19, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There is not much more content in the article than in the list (even though the list extends only to mentioning the species and fantasy of residence. According to the article, the Bakal are not a species, but a single character, in which case the entry in the list mentioned above should also be edited out. Saberwyn 08:30, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Why not merge the content of the article into some other page? (perhaps along with other contribs by the initial stub author as well) ----Unforgettableid | Talk to me 15:41, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. nn fictional character. mikka (t) 01:41, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.