Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful (Aretha Henry album)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Beautiful (Aretha Henry album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable album and possible conflict of interest. No notice in reliable sources, and claims of chart placement are suspicious. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enchanted (Aretha Henry album). ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note - Before anyone says "Redirect to Artist's Article" as is becoming common practice, that article is also being discussed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aretha Henry. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:59, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete not notable, likely WP:COI with article creators. – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 21:46, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete on account of subject failing WP:NALBUM. Rain, Snow, Sleet and Hail / If It's Leaking Get the Pail. Good work, though, folks. -The Gnome (talk) 16:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
- Just to Sum Up - There is a lot of "See also" in the world of Aretha Henry deletion discussions. We now have four AfDs nominated by four different people over five days. This shows you the power of community, if you ask me. Here is what we have so far:
- ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.