Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Botana Curus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Botana Curus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable independent sources found making this a non-notable topic for a Wikipedia article. Philg88 ^♦talk 06:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:05, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately delete and I would've suggested moving elsewhere but there's no target. My searches found nothing good aside from some Books and same at Scholar. Nothing to suggest this is significantly known outside New York and notable for Wiki at this time.SwisterTwister talk 00:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of independent notability for this fictional example. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:45, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.