Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Vigon
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- Brad Vigon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 04:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 12:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 12:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete There's a lack of coverage to meet WP:GNG, which is what he'd need to meet to be a notable coach. His playing career lacks the accomplishments to meet any of the criteria at WP:NHOCKEY. Papaursa (talk) 21:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete and yet another non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails NHOCKEY, no evidence the subject meets the GNG. Ravenswing 12:45, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.