Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenno Faustino
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 04:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Brenno Faustino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not convinced that there's enough independent coverage to meet WP:NBIOGNG. Sourced primarily to advertorial and PR material. KH-1 (talk) 03:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Brazil. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 04:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:58, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. Likely a paid-for vanity page. Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.