Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridget Renee Kendall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bridget Renee Kendall

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't particularly want to delete this article, but I can't find any sources to help improve it and I'm at a complete and utter loss as to what else to do. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-chan^nyan 19:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - She seems to have self published one single book, which is completely unknown according to its amazon sales rank. Non-notable. --~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-chan^nyan 19:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm afraid I agree, this one does not seem to be saveable. According to her Amazon author page, her real name is Brigitte Rene' (possibly René, but some American names do use an apostrophe or a following accent like that, so we should follow her preferred spelling). Unfortunately searching on that found me only her blog, last updated in January 2014, and nothing I can use to find grounds for notability. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even remotely close to being notable. The fact that such a low quality article has existed for 11 years is distressing. LinkedIn is not a reliable source nor is a subjects own website and that is what we have. Also people are not default notable just because they are published writers of fiction. This even comes into play when someone is published by a 3rd-party, but when someone is self-published they are less likely to be notable. There are notable writers who self-publish some or all their work, but they are far outnumbered by non-notable writers who have been self-published.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. One published book rarely denotes notability. Over two dozen doesn't make me notable....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.