Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CanalCanalha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CanalCanalha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meeting WP:NWEB or GNG. In particular it seems a good example of NWEB's warning that famous does not mean notable. From its creation about a year ago until recently this had been a redirect to List of most-subscribed YouTube channels. If that's the final decision of this discussion that seems fine to me. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Without references and strong tendency of self-promotion.Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of independent reliable secondary sources. That's only a collection of self-promotion external links. Bolhones (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.