Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carcariass
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 22:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Carcariass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable band which hasn't acquired significant coverage in reliable sources. Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - The group just isn't notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 13:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 18:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 18:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: non-notable band. Fails WP:GNG. Quis separabit? 20:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as there's simply no improvement. SwisterTwister talk 02:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.