Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celia Holman Lee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:14, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Celia Holman Lee

Delete as nom. Access Denied^(t|c|g|d|s) 16:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vanity page without independent BLP sources Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:46, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~~per nom, non-notable~~ no reliable secondary sources that indicate why she is notable. Maashatra11 (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. When a serious national newspaper considers that someone is so notable as to report the fact that she will not be doing something then I think that the case for deletion needs something stronger than unsubstantiated claims of "just not notable" or "vanity page". Phil Bridger (talk) 23:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have completely rewritten the article from reliable sources. The article is now fully verified and notability has been established. Davewild (talk) 21:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - in view of the rewrite, I have relisted this debate and invited those who have contributed to revisit it. JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Davewild. Kayau Voting IS evil 12:21, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm happy with the rewrite which I have now copyedited Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:22, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.