Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chase Craig (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chase Craig (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent self-bio repeatedly created and deleted in userspace. Makes no assertion of notability whatsoever and is eligible for A7, but since it was moved to article space by another editor I opted for an AFD. I can find nothing that could evidence the subject is notable. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:33, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability via WP:RS. The creator, Whiteratxo, should be blocked as an SPA for self-promotion and WP:NOTHERE. He's made claims on his userpage in the past regarding big celebrities that violated WP:BLP, and the other claims of working with celebs and well-known people have nothing but air behind them. He's just going to keep all this hoaxy nonsense up and keep wasting people's time until someone blocks him. INeverCry 22:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:GNG - lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. - Taketa (talk) 07:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: lots of CRUFT and OR, but mighty thin as far as actual filmographic accomplishments (see [1]). Quis separabit? 04:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.