Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christophe Hansen (politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christophe Hansen (politician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability for politician. No viable secondary sources identified. Gaff (talk) 06:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, 63,000 votes isn't that small in Luxembourg (24% of the national vote), not much less than the candidates elected. There are also plenty of press coverage from .lu sites. --Soman (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Only elected office of this politician is a seat on a town council of a village of 120 people. That dog don't hunt with our special high bar, WP:POLITICIAN. Carrite (talk) 19:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: 6th score country wide and more votes than an elected member — Preceding unsigned comment added by SIWinseler (talk • contribs) 21:18, 2 February 2015 (UTC) — SIWinseler (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete: Subject of the article fails WP:POLITICIAN. If elected in the future, we may consider an article here. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 12:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:42, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN.--DThomsen8 (talk) 16:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being a council member in a municipality of less than 2,000 is not enough to make someone notable. The number of votes recieved when loosing elections is not enough either. Many candidates for US house who lost recieved significantly more than that # of votes, but we have decided that they are not default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
comment for example John Pappageorge recieved over 119,000 votes in one election her ran in (back in 1992), but is only notable because he was later elected to the Michigan State House and Michigan State Senate.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:57, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.