Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Krovatin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No arguments for deletion except from SPAs. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Krovatin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination. Article was prodded by 75.4.198.106 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) with the rationale "non-notable author, just the son of someone famous"; however, it is ineligible for prod due to previously being prodded and contested, so I'm bringing it here on behalf of the IP user.

For my part, I am neutral. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Weak keep Krovatin is the son of Anna Quindlen. I think the situation is a bit different than in 2006 (the article was deleted). The comic book Deadlocke published by Dark Horse was based on his second novel, “Venomous” (see [1] Comic Book Resources and [2] Dark Horse Comics). Additionally, I found [3] Kirkus Reviews and [4] The New York Observer articles. In my opinion it is enough for an informative article about this author. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:17, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:25, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete seems self created, minimal to non-existant achievements — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turnny (talk • contribs) 10:17, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete in reading up on his "novels" they were just projects arranged by his mother and her agent. This page seems to be self-promotion for a spoiled child rather than a chronicle of an estabilished authors's achievements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ETBfeet (talk • contribs) 02:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - For me its a quite clear cut Keep case.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:16, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha Quadrant ^talk 18:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete no achievements just nepotism

Delete don't think he merits wikipedia page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lanuer (talk • contribs) 01:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is an interesting coincidence, Turnny, Hackson25 and Lanuer. All of you started editing at this AfD and your "vote" here is your only edit. (ETBfeet has five edits in total.) I assume this is an attempt to make a sophisticated masquerade, but your meeting here is rather funny. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:23, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.