Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clampco Sistemi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is to delete: non-notable company as per WP:CORP (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:22, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clampco Sistemi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally prodded with "the article fails the WP:ORG criteria and limited sources available on GNews (mainly showing little more that they are a supplier of these products) indicate that this is unlikely to be fixed in the near future." Refs added since are not impressive. The main company Calzavara S.p.A does not yet have an article either here or at it:Calzavara S.p.A — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - According to me references are sound and consistent Gmenta (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the references are of high-quality and discuss the subject in-depth. Notability not shown. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.