Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creepers series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creepers series

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book series for seven chapbooks. I have looked for reviews on Kirkus Reviews, Booklist, and Publishers Weekly, as well as a general Google and Google Scholar search. I found the chapbooks on ISFDB, but it did not list any reviews or awards for any of the books. I would generally WP:BLAR, but the series has two authors, so it doesn't make sense to redirect to one author and not the other. Further, the page previously highlighted a Creepers book series by Edgar J. Hyde. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Paranormal and Australia. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to fail at this moment in time the guideline Wikipedia:Notability_(books). Many of the possible references seen in a Google search appear to be the result of circular referencing to this article (WP:CIRCULAR) and the article therefore is serving as promotion. Republish when it passes WP:BK. 5Q5|^✉ 14:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.