Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cusgarne Community Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 01:47, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cusgarne Community Primary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is extremely short and doesn't convince a person why it is important to keep listed. It doesn't really provide any information to one. Lourie Pieterse 14:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Appears to be a typical elementary school, which we typically merge to an article on the school district. Wikipedia is not a directory. Fails notability. Edison (talk) 16:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 17:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree with nominator and Edison that our rules won't accommodate an article about an elementary or middle school that doesn't meet WP:N. On the other hand, we have no article about the community of Cusgarne. My suggestion to the author is to rename this "Cusgarne" and write about the community, including the school. Mandsford (talk) 14:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rework page as suggested by Mandsford. This is a village with a number of historic references and we certainly need a page on it. TerriersFan (talk) 21:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
make article on the town,and put the info there as proposed. DGG ( talk ) 19:17, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
convert to needed article on municipality as proposed. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 23:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse the suggestion by User:Mandsford. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]
Redirect to the newly-created Cusgarne where I have merged the content. Cunard (talk) 01:10, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.