Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyrillization of chemical nomenclature
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Cyrillization of chemical nomenclature (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The Cyrillization system outlined in the article is completely unsourced original research, and may in fact be entirely fraudulent/a hoax, as two different editors have pointed out on the article's talk page. The previous AfD was closed as Keep because it was bundled together with several other articles on Cyrillization which were deemed useful. So, resubmitting this on its own for comment. CataracticPlanets (talk) 18:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: This looks like a no-brainer: in the previous AfD, every contributor either explicitly urged deleting this particular article, or urged keeping a subset of the articles excluding this one. Imaginatorium (talk) 08:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Double sharp (talk) 14:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Looking at the examples in the table, the "cyrillized" chemical name does not match the actual chemical name used for articles in languages that use the Cyrillic alphabet; for example, adenine in Russian Wikipedia is w:ru:Аденин, not "аденіне" as given in the table. Therefore, I can't see this as anything but original research. ChemNerd (talk) 15:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.