Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daryanne Lees

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:BLPDELETE, without prejudice to a redirect j⚛e decker ^talk 00:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daryanne Lees

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a beauty-pageant contestant - a biography of a living person. I believe this fails the Notability criteria for Models. Witty lama 22:10, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or at best, redirect to Miss Grand International Ugh. Miss Grand International is a very new pageant - only two years old. Miss Grand International 2013 was deleted at AFD very recently, and the pageant Daryanne Lees won was also deleted at AFD. Therefore Lees's sole claim to fame is that she won a non-notable pageant. The main pageant may pass notability, but the individual pageants clearly don't. At best, a redirect to the primary article seems reasonable. The other Miss Grand International, Janelee Chaparro, passes notability for being Miss Puerto Rico in Miss World, something Daryanne Lees can't claim. The sources are pretty primary and if she had won anything truly national, she might pass, but I think at present this person doesn't deserve anything more than a mention on the main page for the pageant. Mabalu (talk) 01:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.