Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Andrew Bovino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wily D 09:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

David Andrew Bovino

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A Lawyer known for only two cases. Except for the refs saying he was attacked in South Africa on his honeymoon, almost all the references are dealing with the court cases Mr. Bovino has been involved in. They either don't mention Bovino or just mention that he is the attorney. Several of the refs are exactly the same. Of the refs that go beyond just a mention, the ArticleFactory ref is unreliable as anybody can submit articles. ArticleFactory says you can increase your exposure by writing your own articles. The rest are from his company or the standard lawyer listings, such as the state bar page. There are no independent, reliable refs about him. Prod was contested for unknown reasons. Bgwhite (talk) 18:52, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Reads like an advertisement, delete per WP:SPAM - DonCalo (talk) 17:56, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He's had a couple of cases that made the papers? That's insufficient for notability. Qworty (talk) 20:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. I can find no independent sources as to the notability of the person, though some of the cases the article mentions themselves have independent and reliable sources. The advertising-spam aspect doesn't help either. This was also likely drawn up by the article's subject. -- Lord Roem (talk) 05:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are not enough reference to prove Bovino is notable. --Vic49 (talk) 14:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.