Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bernardi
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Titoxd(?!?) 04:25, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable writer with no works listed. Google only brings up hits for unrelated people. Bearcat 22:36, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- So what? (Unsigned vote by User:216.249.54.113.)
- So Wikipedia has rules; a person has to be notable to have an article on here. Bearcat 22:40, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- So what you're saying is that just because Google doesn't post it, the author can't be posted? Google doesn't bring up every author, you know. Especially not in Northern Ontario. Encyclopediae are supposed to cover as much knowledge as possible. If you really want, I'll send you a copy of the book. It's entitled "The Rest Has Yet to Be Written", published by "PublishAmerica". Just look up Bernardi in the North Bay phone book; there are only two families with that last name. Hint: Don't start in alphabetical order. Sheesh. (comment left by User:24.235.185.65}
- He published his book with PublishAmerica, the known vanity publisher? Now if he had managed to get a regular publisher interested in his work or if he could present sales figures we could discuss if this should be kept, but since he couldn't this screams vanity. Pilatus 23:41, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- No, what I'm saying is that to be on Wikipedia, a writer has to (a) make a bestseller list, (b) win a major literary award, (c) be generally accepted as an important influence on the development of a national literature or a genre, or (d) meet some other criterion which proves that they're notable. Just existing isn't enough; being able to mail me a copy of the book isn't enough. Bearcat 00:18, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, PublishAmerica is a known vanity/POD publisher, saddly of the somewhat notorious kind (the type depicted in "Foucault's Pendulum"). Interesting article about them in the Washington Post, by the way. Dxco 00:57, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- So what you're saying is that just because Google doesn't post it, the author can't be posted? Google doesn't bring up every author, you know. Especially not in Northern Ontario. Encyclopediae are supposed to cover as much knowledge as possible. If you really want, I'll send you a copy of the book. It's entitled "The Rest Has Yet to Be Written", published by "PublishAmerica". Just look up Bernardi in the North Bay phone book; there are only two families with that last name. Hint: Don't start in alphabetical order. Sheesh. (comment left by User:24.235.185.65}
- So Wikipedia has rules; a person has to be notable to have an article on here. Bearcat 22:40, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as NN. Devotchka 22:43, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as above. Pilatus 23:41, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, vanity page.Dxco 00:57, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN vanity - Just zis Guy, you know? 08:31, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.