Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhanalakshmi Talupu Tadite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dhanalakshmi Talupu Tadite

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:Films. Only one review exists. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - concerns around WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Spiderone 11:46, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as it does have one national newspaper review and probably has offline film magazine coverage, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only 1 review...fails WP:NFILM. Offline coverage is WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- If it's been reviewed in a national newspaper it is likely to be reviewed in at least one of the many offline Indian film magazines, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:36, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:35, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.