Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disruptive direct mail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:31, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive direct mail

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. No indication of notability. It's difficult to discern what the article is actually about. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is a POV fork of Advertising mail. No redirect necessary. Power~enwiki (talk) 01:09, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional literature for some device which embeds touchscreens and trackers in spam snail mail. I can't find any source discussing this invention, the patent in question has never been cited, and the sole reference in the article doesn't mention the invention (it seems to be being cited for the claim that direct-mail is a "multi-billion dollar industry", on the basis that the USPS took in $879 million from direct mailers in 2014). FourViolas (talk) 05:03, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 05:40, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG,OR. South Nashua (talk) 10:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:41, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it is so poorly written that I'm not sure whether it's an advertisement for a particular company, a screed, or an essay, but none of the above belong in an encyclopedia. Bearian (talk) 12:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Original essay. And not a good one. Carrite (talk) 14:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.