Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dublin City Handball
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Dublin City Handball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG, ORG. Couldn't find any external references on Google, only an FB page. South Nashua (talk) 18:54, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Handball-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG (No article sources that indicate notability. Beyond the single reference [which barely supports a claim of just existing ], other searches return only the run of the mill coverage we might expect for an amateur club with a Facebook page/etc). Also doesn't seem to meet WP:CLUB (the claim that the club won a national competition is not supported, and wouldn't in itself confer notability anyway. As SIGCOV is also required). WP:NOTWEBHOST is also a concern (the "players" section in particular is problematic here. Both for being entirely uncited, and as it seems to be a vanity name-dropping exercise for club members who wouldn't seem to meet WP:NSPORT themselves). In short: Delete as NN. Guliolopez (talk) 10:36, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.