Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-local
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- E-local (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a non-notable neologism. The single citation in the article does not list a page number. No other reliable sources could be located. Fails WP:NEO. - MrX 17:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per User:MrX NickGibson3900 (talk) 17:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable neologism, can't find any relevant Ghits. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.