Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian Steel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian Steel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Our fundamental policies WP:What Wikipedia is not and WP:Deletion policy apply given the information and sources only exist as promotional listing content, and not we consider sufficient for notability, see sources: 1, 4 and 5 is company website, 2, 3, 6 and 7 are a funding report, and based on the sources then found here, they're still the same so none of it establishes independent reliable coverage, especially when quoted at WP:ORGIND and WP:GNG: [sources except] brief announcements of mergers or sales of part of the business, simple statements that a product line is being sold, changed, or discontinued, quotations from an organization's personnel, routine notices or passing mentioon. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability which is what everything found is. Considering the past G11 deletion not even a year before an equally promotional article is restarted is not a good sign that content can actually be improved, worse when there's no substantial coverage. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 18:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 18:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of steel producers § Other major steel producers, which lists major steel producers. This will improve the merge target article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect only if needed because it's on our policy to not salvage, save or otherwise keep contents considered still a policy violation and merging it would equally violate it because, since the current information and sources are listing-esque, that would make the other article a host or listing itself, therefore not actually resolving anything. Alternatives to deletion is, as mentioned there, not an immediate factor and can still be outweighed by WP:Deletion policy itself. SwisterTwister talk 18:50, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There 's no point in merging/redirecting to a list. This is not one of the very few areas where we try for a comprehensive list regardless of notability . If the list article contains other non notable firms they should be removed DGG ( talk ) 09:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC) also.[reply]
Delete per policy statements above. Been fighting these COI-pushers around this and Hashima's article for a couple of years now. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 16:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - I've also been fighting promotionalism at Ahmed Abou Hashima for some time, but I reckon that Egyptian Steel might meet WP:GNG, with coverage from Reuters, The Time and MSN amongst others - and that's just looking for English-language sources. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These are all company announcements which are unacceptable as noted by the highlighted green quote above in the nomination, (Sources: 1st is about opening new locations, 2nd is about their financials and both are a clearly labeled company interview, and 3rd is about a sponsored commercial). FWIW, I had examined some Egyptian publications but found nothing announcements myself, so that's a likely sign there's nothing actually different. SwisterTwister talk 21:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.