Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Ogle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Ogle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed. This is a college athlete who does not pass WP:NFOOTBALL. While I understand that the world of women's soccer is somewhat different than the general soccer guidelines, we don't generally view college players as notable unless they're Olympians. agtx 16:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WP:GNG which trumps WP:FOOTY. Hmlarson (talk) 21:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 18:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 18:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - While it is true that Ogle does not meet WP:NFOOTY or WP:NCOLLATH, she does meet WP:GNG with the article on FIFA.com specifically about her. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 18:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 18:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - one in-depth article is not enough for GNG. Giant Snowman 18:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Beyond the FIFA article (which given that it is about the U20 world cup is arguably a primary source anyway) I really cant find anything of substance in third party sources. Fenix down (talk) 10:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per Fenix Down's comment. Not notable yet. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 13:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per Fenix down and established consensuses from Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. GauchoDude (talk) 23:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.