Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eoin McDowell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 19:27, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Eoin McDowell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deleted under expired Prod - concern was "Article subject fails WP:NRU, appears to be a vanity article created by the subject, sources cited do not meet WP:RS." Restored on request - User_talk:SilkTork#Eoin_McDowell. Article does not appear to meet our inclusion criteria. Only two sources mention the subject - one is a home made video uploaded to YouTube, the other is this. There is insufficient coverage to establish notability. SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:02, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nominator pretty much says it all. AIRcorn (talk) 12:17, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to be a vanity project. Concur that it does not meet notability for a biography. FruitMonkey (talk) 08:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:RU/N. --Bob247 (talk) 19:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.