Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Andersen
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Erika Andersen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not notable, puff piece, WP:AUTO violation. all of the cited awards/top X shortlist refs are obscure or from very narrow categories (e.g. "top 5 english language business books in China in 2013"); Forbes Contributor and HBR allow self-publishing. Lizthegrey (talk) 08:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and United States of America. Lizthegrey (talk) 08:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:07, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The Forbes pieces are contributor pieces and written by her. The rest are simply interviews or repeating what's said elsewhere. Self promotion. Oaktree b (talk) 17:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. For the reasons stated in the nomination. Puff piece. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per the nomination and above comments. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 19:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. I am Erika_Andersen. Do I qualify for a page (with all the promotion removed) under WP:AUTHOR#1 ("widely cited by peers")? Please see a list of academic journals citing me here. Erika1952 (talk) 16:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.