Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Hardy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ernest Hardy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Long unsourced article on a subject with no reliable secondary sources. The award noted seems to be of minor industry specific interest only. Kevin (talk) 04:52, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Notability (and an interesting article) requires coverage in secondary sources, not just by-lines, awards, and other resume-like items. Sorry to be so harsh. If sources could be provided then he does seem important enough. The problem is that journalists seldom write about other journalists, except if the subject is on the highest level. Jaque Hammer (talk) 12:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unable to find coverage in any reliable sources independent of the subject. Does not meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. —J04n(talk page) 13:10, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unreferenced BLP. In the last paragraph, I took the liberty of removing the biased content and rewriting it to read less like a resume. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:58, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I found this while looking around. Most everything else I saw were blogs or other un-usable sources.Wolfstorm000 (talk) 23:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.