Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith and Desire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 17:06, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Faith and Desire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In spite of claims in the article to cross-Canada radio play and international distribution of their recordings, I haven't been able to find even one recording or performance review, or any other independently written information, about this band. —Anne Delong (talk) 12:27, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:56, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:57, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I actually was able to find a handful of hits for this band on a ProQuest search, once I filtered the search to eliminate hits on the generic phrase "faith and desire" as a euphemism for spirituality and religion rather than the name of a rock band — but the hits were all glancing acknowledgements of the band's existence in routine concert listings, not substantive coverage about the band. So the article simply isn't salvageable: there's no substantive reliable source coverage locatable to support it, and bands are not handed a free pass over NMUSIC just because the article makes unsourced and unsourceable claims to passing NMUSIC. And for that matter, Ian Cameron (musician) (the only band member with a standalone BLP separate from the band) may not really qualify for an article either. Bearcat (talk) 15:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 09:50, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.