Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faizul Latif Chowdhury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Faizul Latif Chowdhury

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find coverage in secondary reliable sources that supports the lengthy list of facts mentioned in this article. The Legend of Zorro 10:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How do we determine whether his books, translations and political positions are notable? Candleabracadabra (talk) 05:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot say how much impact his books on Jibananda Das has made in Bangladesh but I have never heard his name in Bengali newspapers in West Bengal. I cannot say about his political positions but I am not seeing any coverage in secondary reliable sources. The Legend of Zorro 08:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. The Legend of Zorro 08:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Little impact in GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.