Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Father Soosai Nayagam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Father Soosai Nayagam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ACADEMIC Pamzeis (talk) 13:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Pamzeis (talk) 13:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 14:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:PROF; nothing to suggest notability of any kind. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. As others have noted above, there is no indication of the subject's notability under WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Moreover, taking a look at the talk page of the article's creator, User talk:Wiki orb2, shows that this editor is an SPA with a persistent history of re-creating various versions of this article, after it had been deleted under G11 and G12. Some prior versions apparently involved copyvio of [1]. The same user talk page indicates that the user has a likely COI in relation to the subject of the article. Also, the photo of the subject currently used in the article has been uploaded by User:Wiki orb2 with the tag 'own work'. Personally, I think that an indeff WP:NOTHERE block should also be considered here since I am not seeing any evidence of constructive editing by User:Wiki orb2, only persistent promotional, COI and copyvio editing. Nsk92 (talk) 12:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero evidence of notability; an academic with next to no coverage Spiderone 20:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.