Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firnas Airways

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:15, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Firnas Airways

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alleged prospective airline with no coverage. The references link to their own SNS profiles and a poll they set up. Speedy was declined. Alakzi (talk) 18:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:FAILN recommend listing this information in a directory per WP:ALTERNATIVE. Bryce Carmony (talk) 18:59, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-Per nom. Cheap Promo. Educationtemple (talk) 19:37, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. WP:PROMOTION –Davey2010^Talk 20:16, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:58, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:58, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:59, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Multiple searches (Highbeam, Questia, Google, Guardian) turn up nothing on this firm. I'm not sure why this didn't go by CSD A7: Twitter, Instagram, Linkedin and FreeOnlineSurveys fall short of WP:CORPDEPTH by a long distance. AllyD (talk) 06:47, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess airlines meet the WP:A7 bar - wherever that bar might be actually set - no matter what; A7 is not applicable if the reliability of the sources is what's under question. Alakzi (talk) 19:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.