Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frog Fractions 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Frog Fractions . Opinion split evenly between delete, keep, and merge. Merge is ~~something of a wimpout~~ a highly rational middle ground. If, as the keepers suggest, this really is a thing, it will attract the required coverage and it can be split back out it its own article at that time. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frog Fractions 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTAL -- browser game still under development / The references seem to be about another game, claimed to be the inspiration for this one. DGG ( talk ) 20:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's nothing yet suggesting the needed solidity to confirm notability, there's news but it basically says the same thing, not yet notable. SwisterTwister talk 20:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:47, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pernom. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:PERNOM. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - According to the article, and the references, it is not clear that the game is under development-- it could very well be finished, and be playable, right now. There is cited extensive media coverage directly about the fact that this game may or may not currently exist, if people could just find it (via ARG). This is sufficient notability for me. WP:CRYSTAL does not apply, since the effort to find the game is current and ongoing. From the references, this appears similarly notable to, for example, I Love Bees... perhaps not covered quite as much, but in my opinion, the coverage threshold has been met. Fieari (talk) 07:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Supported by quite a lot of reliable sources, including [1][2][3] and the first three sources in the article. It passes WP:GNG, and some of the sources (Wired and Polygon) have quite a lot of information about the game. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Still under development? You're mistaken User:DGG, you are playing Frog Fractions 2 right now.[4] - hahnch e n 22:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Frog Fractions#Sequel for the time being. If the page undergoes expansion in the future it can be split off again at a later date. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 06:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (or Keep): As above, multiple game/tech press references. - BalthCat (talk) 08:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge until the game is actually released. Right now it's just a confusing mess about an ARG. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 10:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Frog Fractions until released. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.