Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Fairman (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 18:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriel Fairman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not really sure what's going on here. When I nominated it for AFD, it took me to an old AFD discussion where the result was delete so I assume it was deleted. Nevertheless, here the article is again with no sources to establish notability. Megtetg34 (talk) 03:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Potential G4. Do you remember its past content? Thanks and don't bite me, DePlume (talk) 03:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Its past content can be found to the right of the page in the first deletion discussion. Have a look. Megtetg34 (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - insufficient sourcing, and a Google search doesn't turn up very much else. Fails WP:GNG. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 05:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:16, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt fails WP:GNG, not notable, and repeatedly recreated. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Not notable. Salt because the article with the same name has been created many many times. Mohammad (talk) 09:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note I've declined the G4 speedy deletion because it's different enough from the original version, with more references. No comment on the validity of those references or on notability. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an overly prmotional article on a businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.