Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gale Force

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Jim Wynorski. So Why 09:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gale Force

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Though nominated for four minor DVD awards, I can't find any evidence that the film meets WP:NFILM -- nor does the article provide any. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Jim Wynorski (director). Straight-to-DVD movie with no obvious importance. IMDb lists 4 reviews[1]; 2 appeared to be broken links and even if the others[2][3] are reliable sources (which I'm not sure of), that doesn't quite meet WP:NFILM #1. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:48, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to improve an article . with this cast I feel it's worthy of inclusion Dutchy85 (talk) 23:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is a strong cast for a straight-to-DVD film, but it still needs more references. Maybe it is old enough that there is some off-line/print coverage. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: to the director. The Blogspot source certainly isn't reliable and I found no coverage beyond what IMDb lists. SL93 (talk) 19:13, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jim Wynorski, its director. The film lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:NFILM. --Bejnar (talk) 02:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

keep I apologize for coming so late into the game. I'll vote "keep", because I have some sympathy for B-films, and the cast is very good for a film this type. Keep in mind, that understand why one would differ. Furthermore, in my opinion, it makes no sense to redirect it. The film is still locked it to some pages. I was working on the page of one of the actor. Clicked on it and ended up on the Directors page, I was confused (and can imagine how a Wiki reader who doesn't contribute would feel). I say keep it because the space exist and my other points, however if you differ delete not re-direct it, DELETE it all together.Filmman3000 (talk) 21:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]